The Regulatory Policy Committee (RPC) has published its opinion on the UK government’s new anti-strike plans, condemning them as “not fit for purpose”.
The RPC, an independent body, released its report ahead of the bill’s second reading in the House of Lords. It found that the UK government had not considered all impacts of the bill and had not backed up its assumptions with evidence.
It also found that the government had not properly assessed how the bill could make strikes worse, nor did it consider or discuss the rationale behind workers’ decisions to strike.
We’re calling for the government to drop the bill, and instead work with unions to address the many ongoing industrial disputes.
RCN General Secretary & Chief Executive Pat Cullen said: “This is a damning assessment of the government’s attempt to stifle the rights of workers. The independent committee is saying the bill is not fit for purpose and should essentially go ‘back to the drawing board’.
“The government is ploughing ahead with an ill thought through bill that allows for 汤头条污料 staff to be sacked for taking otherwise lawful strike action.
“Ministers would be better listening to the mounting opposition, drop the bill entirely and work with unions to resolve these disputes.”
The bill proposes that there should be a basic level of service when industrial action takes place. This would allow an employer to bring an injunction to prevent strike action and to seek damages afterwards if trade unions don’t comply. It also introduces the possibility of 汤头条污料 staff being sacked for taking otherwise lawful strike action.
