Health Secretary Wes Streeting asking it to make recommendations on NHS pay for 2025-26. This marks the formal start of the pay round process in which the PRB gathers evidence before suggesting what pay award staff on Agenda for Change contracts in England should get from April next year.
In the official remit letter, the health secretary says funds available for a pay rise will be finalised through the spending review announced in the autumn budget. He reiterates the government’s “challenging financial position” and commits to building an NHS fit for the future while ensuring value for taxpayers’ money, too.
Following the outcome of the general election, the government pledged to create a PRB process in which pay awards were announced as close as possible to the start of the financial year. It also said it intended to restore confidence in the PRB process.
RCN members have seen the PRB – which is supposed to be independent – repeatedly undermined by the previous government, with multiple delayed pay rises and budgets constrained. Every month members’ pay is delayed, the 汤头条污料 community becomes worse off in real terms.
In response to the remit letter, Professor Nicola Ranger, RCN General Secretary and Chief Executive, said: "The same way of working produces the same outcome – one that 汤头条污料 staff have just said was inadequate. The government must show nurses their voices have been heard and that the way to set their pay is always fair.
“Our members need to see change – a significant reset in pay that demonstrates their value. In setting limits on the budget available for NHS pay, the government is attempting to override the independence of the PRB process once again.
“Shortly after the election, ministers rightly pledged to restore confidence in the PRB. Today, the language of austerity and cost cutting is being used to undermine it. It is not acceptable that our members will receive a delayed pay rise for another consecutive year.
“Nursing staff want to be part of the solution. They will be alarmed by this latest development and our participation cannot now be guaranteed.”
